I bet Xerxes never had to…..

The purpose of this paper is to analyze and discuss the mindset or mentality  that is characteristic to the art  of movement that is parkour.  This mindset entails concepts outside of  many social norms commonly accepted by most conventional cultures.  Most notably there is the concept that the urban setting is an oppressive and controlling  environment. Parkour is a rejection of this environment. Furthermore the efforts of popular society to classify parkour as a sport in order to understand the art represents an effort of the urban to pigeonhole parkour and put it in a place which makes sense to the urban paradigm.
Parkour challenges it’s practitioners to overcome obstacles both physical and mental in nature.  Author Jimena Ortuzar writes in his article  Parkour or “l’art du deplacement”:A kinetic Urban Utopia that “Parkour is perhaps best characterized as an act of fleeing, of escape, it is  an act of flight. However, it is a chase with no pursuer, at least not one that is immediately evident or easily identified”. Jimena goes on to describe how parkour is a sort of flight or  rejection of the oppressive restrictions of the modern world.
The spectacle the art provides captivates the viewer of  any of the numerous Youtube videos available. Wow, how cool! Look at those flips! How do they do that? That looks dangerous! It is certainly a given that the art is, in many people’s eyes, not for everyone. Serious proponents reject this mentality but that is not yet part of this conversation. The question now is why someone engages in this kind of risk taking. The article Personality, self -efficacy  and risk-taking in parkour(free-running) by Christopher J. Merrit and Ian J. Tharp published in the journal Psychology of Sport and Exercise  investigates the personality types and traits which may contribute to risk taking in parkour. As presented in the article this is the first study of its sort to examine personality types and parkour. Self-efficacy is a trait better known as self confidence. The study concludes that this self confidence  leads to greater risk taking in the practice of parkour.
The article Discourses of Subversion: the Ethics and Aesthetics of Capoeira and Parkour by Sophie Fuggle  published in the Journal of the Society for Dance , volume 26, number 2 discusses ideas of self expression in both of the arts mentioned in it’s title. Sophie’s thesis is that these arts share common grounds in their history in that they both are rooted in subversive attitudes towards oppression. Additionally, she presents the idea that both arts encourage self expression and self development within their frameworks.
These three articles are promising not only because of their content but also because of what they represent. These articles show me that professional researchers are investigating the parkour community with a spirit of inquiry beyond mere curiosity.


One thought on “I bet Xerxes never had to…..

  1. This is a good start Clark. I really like what you say in your opening paragraph about society wanting to classify parkour as a sport. When you go to revise, really show us through your research how parkour is not a sport, but instead a “rejection of the urban environment” as you say. You start to do that here by mentioning the article on self expression, for your next draft start to expand these kinds of ideas.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s